Blog - Commentshttp://www.seanoc.com/blog/en-USSquarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)Frank comments on Chill The F*!% out over the Google/Verizon ProposalFrankWed, 18 Aug 2010 16:57:52 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2010/8/17/chill-the-f-out-over-the-googleverizon-proposal.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/9416675Hi, nice to read something reasonable and well thought out on this topic!
FYI the only other anti-hysterics article on this topic I have found yet can be read at http://torrentfreak.com/verizon-and-att-ban-bittorrent-on-wireless-networks-100813/

]]>Vadim comments on Chill The F*!% out over the Google/Verizon ProposalVadimWed, 18 Aug 2010 10:44:36 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2010/8/17/chill-the-f-out-over-the-googleverizon-proposal.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/9413947This is of course pure speculation but it can explain Google's attitude to wireless net neutrality:
It could be that they want to enter into Wireless net business. Suppose they plan to introduce very cheap "All can you eat" Wireless net access with net neutrality implemented de-facto. They will catch all other wireless operators with their pants down. I'm pretty sure they'll get massive migration of wireless customers to their services.
Of course they don't have actual experience of such a business. So they'll need to buy a smallish operator and develop it. Anybody heard rumors about such negotiations?

]]>Jacob Chapel comments on Chill The F*!% out over the Google/Verizon ProposalJacob ChapelWed, 18 Aug 2010 10:11:43 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2010/8/17/chill-the-f-out-over-the-googleverizon-proposal.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/9413845This is the most reasoned and thought out post on this matter that I have seen. Everything else, from big sites to small have cried wolf on this issue making it into something it really isn't. Thank you for your great input and I hope people see this and realize that to freak out doesn't solve anything and is about an issue that doesn't exist.

]]>Steve comments on Chill The F*!% out over the Google/Verizon ProposalSteveWed, 18 Aug 2010 05:19:32 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2010/8/17/chill-the-f-out-over-the-googleverizon-proposal.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/9411918Couldn't have said it better myself.

]]>tpherndon comments on Solango Tips and GotchastpherndonFri, 02 Oct 2009 19:31:10 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2009/5/25/solango-tips-and-gotchas.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816515Sean, do you have any examples of updating a record? I'm facing a M2M field not updating Solr problem, and I'd love to see some example code if you've got any floating around.

Thanks,

---Peter

]]>seanoc comments on Solango Tips and GotchasseanocWed, 27 May 2009 01:20:32 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2009/5/25/solango-tips-and-gotchas.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816516Good typo catch! You are correct.

]]>seanoc comments on Solango Tips and GotchasseanocWed, 27 May 2009 01:17:44 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2009/5/25/solango-tips-and-gotchas.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816517I do have haystack on my radar but have not had time to really check it out yet. For my current project I inhereited a significant code base already dependant on solango. Thanks for the info tho!

]]>carljm comments on Solango Tips and GotchascarljmTue, 26 May 2009 15:39:09 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2009/5/25/solango-tips-and-gotchas.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816518In the second bullet point under Facets, I think you mean "denormalize." It doesn't make sense to "normalize" several independent properties into a single property.

]]>Hank Sims comments on Solango Tips and GotchasHank SimsTue, 26 May 2009 13:42:33 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2009/5/25/solango-tips-and-gotchas.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816519Have you checked out http://haystacksearch.org/" rel="nofollow">Haystack as a Solr frontend? Not to take anything away from the Washington Times guys -- they are giants among men -- but Haystack is much more intuitive and it seems to be more functional.

Documentation isn't 100 percent, but it's pretty far along.

]]>fernandoacorreia comments on sPaste|source - a secure, open source, pastebinfernandoacorreiaFri, 31 Oct 2008 15:33:50 +0000http://www.seanoc.com/blog/2008/10/31/spastesource-a-secure-open-source-pastebin.html#comments470475:6268623:comment/7816538An interesting project. Thanks for sharing.

]]>